Attitudes towards the playing with clips cures and you may intent for action in the long run

Similar to the working alliance, the perceived quality of the real relationship was related to using more methods to prepare the patients to the transition (r = .18, p < .05) and perceived positive patient experience (r = .24, p < .01). Age, years of clinical experience, number of patients seen weekly before the pandemic, previous video therapy experience, and views of video therapy before the pandemic were not associated with the perceived quality of alliance or the real relationship in online sessions.

Elite self-question and nervousness

On average, therapists experienced professional self-doubt sometimes or frequently (M = 2.41, SD = .67, range: 1.11–4.78) in video therapy during the pandemic, which is higher than the level of self-doubt experienced by therapists in a prior naturalistic study of PSD (Nissen-Lie et al., 2013 ; t(136) = , p < .0001), but still on the lower end of the 5-point Likert scale. Therapists felt less competent (M = 2.28, SD = .52, range: 1.00–3.00) and less confident (M = 2.15, SD = .56, range: 1.00–3.00) about their professional skills during online compared to in-person sessions. Higher levels of reported professional self-doubt were related to several demographic variables, such as younger age (r = ?.34, p < .001), less clinical experience (r = ?.33, p < .001), and worse perceived patient experience (r = ?.36, p < .001).

Therapists’ anxiety about using video therapy was moderate (M = 2.87, S.D. = .86, range: 1.00–4.83). Similar to professional self-doubt, higher anxiety was associated with female gender (t(137) = 3.24, p < .05), younger age (r = ?.30, p < .001), less clinical experience (r = ?.36, p < .001), smaller number of patients before the pandemic (r = ?.18, p < .05), no previous experience with video therapy (t(138) = 3.63, p < .001), not being licensed yet (t(136) = 3.28, p < .001), perceiving patients as having a negative video therapy experience (r = .27, p < .001).

Overall in our sample, therapists reported somewhat positive attitudes towards video therapy (M = 3.42, SD = 0.50, range: 2.31–4.69). Although their views about video therapy had become more positive since the start of the pandemic (t(140) = 2.06, p < .05); they still thought that video therapy was somewhat less effective compared to in-person therapy (M = 2.19, SD = 0.65, range: 1.00–4.00).

Therapists who held more positive attitudes towards video therapy tended to have previous experience with video therapy (t(142) = 3.53, p < .05) and to have positive perceptions of their patients' online experience (r = .30, p < .001). Higher rated working alliance and real relationship were associated with more positive attitudes towards video therapy (r = ?.34, p < .001 and r = ?.40, p < .001, respectively) whereas professional self-doubt was associated with more negative attitudes (r = ?.34, p < .001).

The sample of therapists as a whole was undecided as to whether they would like to continue using video therapy in the future (i.e. expressed a neutral response on the UTUAT Behavior Intention subscale), with large differences among therapists (M = 3.14, SD = 1.23, range: 1.00–5.00). Therapists who intended to use video therapy in the future were more likely to have prior experience with video therapy (t(138) = 2.91, p < .01), and tended to have positive perceptions of their patients' online experience (r = .32, p < .001).

Find Table step 1 to own an introduction to the brand new correlations between the standardized tips. The new relational, professional and technology-relevant bills was basically correlated about requested assistance. Particularly, score to your actual dating https://datingranking.net/mature-women-hookup/ and working alliance have been certainly correlated, and you can elite mind-question and stress were absolutely about both however, negatively with the advertised performing alliance and you can genuine relationship, appearing you to practitioners which have lower levels from elite group self-question and stress said a more powerful operating alliance and actual relationship and their on the internet customers within the pandemic. The newest perceptions towards the and intent to use movies cures on future were certainly with the ratings of your working alliance, and actual matchmaking, and you will negatively related to elite group care about-question and you will anxiety (discover Table step one).

In today’s get across-sectional survey investigation, i aimed to understand more about therapists’ enjoy of clips treatment switching out-of for the-individual videos instruction inside pandemic. Alot more particularly, i checked: 1) Counselor perceptions of healing dating (working alliance and you will genuine relationships) in the films courses compared to past inside the-individual therapy; 2) Specialist confidence during the elite skills (elite group care about-doubt) and you can experienced nervousness regarding providing movies medication; 3) Counselor thinking on video medication technical typically, together with intends to continue using films therapy in the coming.

With the introduce take to, the inner surface guess is Cronbach’s ? = .86. To assess the new knowledgeable change in the true dating because the switch to videos cures, the second item try extra: “Compared to the during the-person coaching, during my on the web lessons the latest healing relationship thought … ” as answered towards a about three-part Likert level (step 1 = a lot more real compared to-people, 2 = an identical, step 3 = quicker genuine compared to-person).

Efficiency

Women reported higher working alliance in online sessions compared to men (t(137) = 2.18, p < .05), licensed practitioners reported higher alliance score than trainees (t(136) = 2.33, p < .05), and practitioners in North America (USA and Canada) compared to those in Europe (t(137) = 2.08, p < .05). Within the sample, higher online alliance was also reported by those who used a greater variety of methods (as opposed to fewer methods) to prepare patients for the transition (r = .26, p < .01), and those who perceived their patients' experience with video therapy more positively (as opposed to less positively) (r = .32, p < .001).